Skip to main content


#Linux #audio: #PreSonus Studio24C -vs- #Steinberg UR22C #review !

Studio24C has 5-state level indicators for both input and output channels. UR22C has only 2 state indicators (peak or not) for ins, and nothing for outs. You won't know if you get any audio until it's clipped. Without a software meter, gain is a mystery. That's crippling. Why didn't they use RGB LEDs?

UR22C's selling point is onboard DSP that can only be set on Windows or Mac. Also can run on a powerbank.

More details in pics!

This entry was edited (2 years ago)
in reply to unfa🇺🇦

About UR22C's "32-bit audio interface" tagline: it's a gross simplification at best and plain false advertising at worst.
The interface's A/D converters are 24-bit like any other I/F's in this class, and the 32-bit refers to onboard DSP processing only. No, you won't get a higher dynamic range when recording through it. The USB-C 3.1 connectivity and the 32-bit marketing makes it seem like something more than it is.
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
unfa🇺🇦
@octopoulpe I suspect the PreSonus Studio24C would also have a solid chunk of it's wight in the metal shell - to some extent I appreciate that if it makes the device more rugged. Unless we're putting steel slabs in to fake "heft" 😁
in reply to unfa🇺🇦

The motu M4 appears to be better than those 2 relative to the things you’re looking for
in reply to sxpert

@sxpert Yes, but MOTU M4 costs 270 EUR and PreSonus Studio24C is 150 EUR. That's almost 2 times cheaper.

This website uses cookies. If you continue browsing this website, you agree to the usage of cookies.